"Even If Building Is Demolished Today, I Won't Allow Listing": CJI Surya Kant Slams Supreme Court Bypass

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has slammed the practice of litigants directly approaching the Supreme Court, stating that even if a building is demolished today, he would not allow listing such petitions.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has slammed the practice of litigants directly approaching the Supreme Court without first exhausting remedies in lower courts. The Chief Justice made the remarks while hearing a matter where the petitioner had bypassed the High Court and filed a petition directly in the Supreme Court.

"Even if a building is demolished today, I won't allow listing," CJI Surya Kant said, slamming the practice of directly approaching the Supreme Court.

"This practice of filing petitions directly in the Supreme Court without approaching the High Court must stop."

The Chief Justice's remarks come amid growing concerns about the Supreme Court's workload and the increasing tendency of litigants to bypass lower courts. The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that it is a court of last resort and that litigants must first seek remedies in the High Courts.

"The Supreme Court is not the first court of appeal. It is the final court of appeal," the Chief Justice said.

"Litigants must respect the hierarchy of courts and exhaust their remedies in the High Courts before approaching this court."

The Chief Justice's comments have been welcomed by legal experts, who have long called for stricter adherence to the judicial hierarchy. They have also raised questions about the role of the Supreme Court in ensuring that its jurisdiction is exercised only in appropriate cases.

Here is the question this ruling raises. CJI Surya Kant has slammed the practice of directly approaching the Supreme Court, stating that even if a building is demolished, he won't allow listing. When litigants bypass lower courts, does it undermine the judicial hierarchy and burden the apex court with cases that should be heard elsewhere?

As CJI Surya Kant slams the practice of directly approaching the Supreme Court, The Silicon Review asks a final question. When the highest court in the land must repeatedly warn litigants against bypassing lower courts, what does it take to ensure the judicial hierarchy is respected?

FAQ:

Q: What did CJI Surya Kant say about directly approaching the Supreme Court?
A: CJI Surya Kant slammed the practice of litigants directly approaching the Supreme Court, stating that even if a building is demolished today, he would not allow listing such petitions.

Q: Why did CJI Surya Kant make these remarks?
A: The Chief Justice made the remarks while hearing a matter where the petitioner had bypassed the High Court and filed a petition directly in the Supreme Court.

Q: What is the Supreme Court's position on bypassing lower courts?
A: The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that it is a court of last resort and that litigants must first seek remedies in the High Courts.

Q: What has been the reaction to CJI Surya Kant's remarks?
A: Legal experts have welcomed the Chief Justice's comments, calling for stricter adherence to the judicial hierarchy.