Switch Edition
Home

>>

Technology

>>

Cyber security

>>

Latest TikTok Ad Scam: Man Los...

CYBER SECURITY

Latest TikTok Ad Scam: Man Loses S$3,800 after Clicking TikTok Ad, Tribunal Says He Is Liable, Not the Bank

Latest TikTok Ad Scam: Man Loses S$3,800 after Clicking TikTok Ad, Tribunal Says He Is Liable, Not the Bank
The Silicon Review
16 June, 2026
Author: Vinay Kumar

An online banking scam cost a Singaporean man S$3,800 after he clicked on a TikTok ad that led to a phishing website. A financial tribunal ruled he was liable for the losses, not his bank.

An online banking scam has cost a Singaporean man S$3,800 after he fell victim to a phishing attack triggered by a TikTok advertisement. The man clicked on the ad, was redirected to a convincing fake bank login page, and entered his credentials. Within minutes, unauthorized transactions drained his account. When he sought recourse from his bank, he was denied. When he took the case to a financial tribunal, he lost again.

The tribunal ruled that the man was liable for the online banking scam losses, not the bank. The decision hinged on the finding that he had voluntarily provided his banking credentials to the fraudulent website. Under the bank's terms and conditions, customers are responsible for safeguarding their login details.

The man argued that the bank should have detected the unusual activity and blocked the transactions. The bank countered that the transactions were authenticated using the man's credentials and OTP, which had been sent to his registered mobile number. The tribunal accepted the bank's position.

This ruling is significant. It reinforces the principle that customers who fall for online banking scams by voluntarily disclosing their credentials bear the financial consequences. Banks are not obligated to reimburse losses caused by customer negligence.

The tribunal noted that the man had received multiple warnings from the bank about phishing scams. He had also seen public awareness campaigns warning against clicking on unsolicited links. Despite these warnings, he proceeded to enter his banking details.

The online banking scam is part of a broader trend. Phishing attacks have surged in recent years, with scammers using social media platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram to target victims. The Singapore Police Force has reported thousands of such cases annually.

As an online banking scam costs a man S$3,800 after he clicked on a TikTok ad and a tribunal finds him liable, The Silicon Review examines how consumers bear the cost of fraud even as banks and platforms profit from digital transactions.

FAQ:

Q: How did the online banking scam happen?
A: The man clicked on a TikTok ad that redirected him to a phishing website where he entered his banking credentials and OTP.

Q: Why was the man found liable for the online banking scam losses?
A: The tribunal ruled he was liable because he voluntarily provided his banking details to the fraudulent website.

Q: Could the bank have prevented the online banking scam?
A: The bank argued the transactions were authenticated using the man's credentials and OTP sent to his phone.

Q: What is a phishing scam in online banking?
A: A phishing scam is when fraudsters create fake websites to trick victims into entering their banking login details.

Q: Did the man receive warnings about online banking scams?
A: Yes, the tribunal noted the man had received multiple bank warnings and seen public awareness campaigns.

MOST VIEWED ARTICLES

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Client-Speak Magazine Subscribe Newsletter Video
Magazine Store
May Edition Cover
🚀 NOMINATE YOUR COMPANY NOW 🎉 GET 10% OFF 🏆 LIMITED TIME OFFER Nominate Now →